The Photographic History

The Attempts on Charleston

Volume VI, The Navies, 1911, pages 238–39

From the chapter “The Actions with the Forts”, Chapter IX

The navy's own verdict on the siege: month after month of assault by water and land, Wagner evacuated rather than carried, Sumter beaten to brick dust and not surrendered, and the city taken in the end by Sherman turning his back on it.

Cite as

James Barnes, “The Attempts on Charleston,” in The Photographic History of the Civil War, ed. Francis Trevelyan Miller, vol. 6, The Navies (New York: Review of Reviews Co., 1911), 238–39.

Published
1911
Volume
VI — The Navies
Pages
238–39
Kind
from a chapter
Author
James Barnes

Quite as remarkable were the continual and ineffectual attempts on the part of the Federal forces to reduce the city of Charleston. To its wharves blockade-runners continually made their way up to the very last days of the war. Off its harbor was maintained the strongest fleet, in the point of efficiency, weight of metal, and actual fighting qualities, that existed in that day. Month after month, Charleston was assailed both by water and land. Under the direction of General Gillmore and General Terry, breaching batteries were erected in the marshes, and although most of the outlying earthworks and batteries were taken, many determined assaults were repulsed. Fort Wagner, on Morris Island, continued its brave and determined resistance until September 7, 1863, when it was evacuated just as a strong force of three thousand troops was ready to make the third assault. Although reduced to nothing but a pile of brick dust and debris, Sumter did not surrender, though day and night the fire of heavy guns from both the war-ships and the heavy artillery of the army was kept uj).

Charleston's defense was something for her citizens to look back upon with pride. It was neither the Federal army nor navy that caused her downfall, but, as a contemporaneous writer has i)ut it, " General Sherman took the city by turning his back on it."