The recent change in the labor system of this State must of necessity induce important changes in pursuits, and what those changes may be is now the question of most absorbing interest. That pursuits will become more varied, and that much of our labor will be withdrawn to employment in the arts and enterprises collateral to agriculture, is reasonably certain; but what, then, will be the effect upon existing interests, and particularly upon investments in plantation culture, is a most important question.
These interests, in the seaboard sections of the State at least, are vast, and it is of vast concern whether under present circumstances we can sustain them. Plantations are peculiar forms of agriculture. They are seldom seen except in slave or densely crowded countries. They are exclusively devoted to a single product, and through such devotion raise it at a range of prices quite too [low to be sustained by free labour].
“The recent change in the labor system of this State” is how a Charleston paper referred to the abolition of slavery in August 1865. The sentence worth stopping on is the plain one in the middle: plantations “are seldom seen except in slave or densely crowded countries.” The paper is not making a moral argument; it is doing arithmetic, and the arithmetic tells it that the low-country plantation cannot be paid for out of free wages. Everything that followed in South Carolina — the Black Codes that autumn, the contract system, the long fight over land — is an attempt to answer the question this paragraph asks.
Charleston Daily News, 21 August 1865, p. 2, “The Situation — Plantation Culture in this State”